Thomas Sheridan | Cultural Marxism & The Psyop in Europe | Hour 1 | July 7, 2014

Source: <a href="http://www.redicecreations.com/radio/2014/07/RIR-140707.php" target="_blank">redicecreations.com</a>, <a href="http://thomassheridanarts.com/" target="_blank">thomassheridanarts.com</a><br /><br /> <iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="309" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/EebZ_FiYO4g" width="550"></iframe><br /><b><br /></b> <b>July 7, 2014–</b>Thomas Sheridan is an author, artist, musician, satirist and independent researcher, best known for the book, Puzzling People: the Labyrinth of the Psychopath, along with his writings on socio-cultural engineering, propaganda and the influence of late Victorian occult societies and policy think-tanks upon the creation of both Fascism and Bolshevism, and the paralysing shadow these aristocratically created and cultivated symbiotic ideologies have cast upon the face of humanity.<br /><br />In the first hour, we’ll talk about cultural Marxism as a corrosive force in Europe that piggybacks on the environmental movement, the gay rights movement and other minorities to further its cause. Then, we’ll discuss Germany as the heart of Europe and those who sought to create a new kind of German, a mechanical man. Thomas talks about the making of a Bavarian Bolshevik and a great psyop that took place in Germany.<br /><br />Later, we discuss how Europeans have been fractured by Semitic traditions and archetypes. In the member’s hour, Thomas elaborates on the extraordinary heritage of Europeans, which is diverse and should be celebrated not shunned. He talks about how European folklore, sagas and mythology help to change consciousness. Also, we discuss disinfo coming out of Hollywood surrounding European history and the psyop of the “White man’s burden.” We’ll talk about Irish slaves, the American Civil War and re-examining history. Later, we’ll discuss the portrayal of the “dumb White man” as well as the Marxist instigated war between women and men. At the end, Thomas elaborates on winning the culture war. -redicecreations.com<br /><br /><a href="http://rediceradio.net/radio/2014/RIR-140707-thomassheridan-hr1.mp3">download hour 1 mp3</a>

Thomas Sheridan | Cultural Marxism & The Psyop in Europe | Hour 1 | July 7, 2014

Source: redicecreations.com, thomassheridanarts.com July 7, 2014–Thomas Sheridan is an author, artist, musician, satirist and independent researcher, best known for the book, Puzzling People: the Labyrinth of the Psychopath, along with his writings on socio-cultural engineering, propaganda and th…

Read more »

Eating Meat Causes Cancer!

<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: #37404e; font-family: Helvetica, Arial, 'lucida grande', tahoma, verdana, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 15px;"></span><br /><div class="aboveUnitContent" style="margin-bottom: 15px; margin-top: 15px;"><div class="userContentWrapper"><div class="_wk" style="font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px;"><span class="userContent"><div class="text_exposed_root text_exposed" id="id_53bcd9850b49c8195484662" style="display: inline;">Eating Red Meat Increases Risk For Breast Cancer!<br />. . .<br />Eating red meat is linked to breast cancer, according to a new study in the British Medical Journal. Premenopausal women participating in Harvard’s Nurses’ Health Study II who consume<span class="text_exposed_show" style="display: inline;">d the most red meat were 22 percent more likely to develop breast cancer, compared with those who consumed the least. Each additional serving of red meat per day was associated with a 13 percent increased risk in breast cancer.<br />. . .<br />Farvid MS, Cho E, Chen WY, Eliassen AH, Willett WC. Dietary protein sources in early adulthood and breast cancer incidence: prospective cohort study. BMJ.<br /><br />Published online June 10, 2014<br /><a href="https://www.facebook.com/130716166943671/photos/a.650980698250546.1073741831.130716166943671/721888044493144/?type=3&theater" rel="nofollow" style="color: #3b5998; cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none;">https://www.facebook.com/130716166943671/photos/a.650980698250546.1073741831.130716166943671/721888044493144/?type=3&theater</a><br /><br />Breast Cancer Detection Using Thermography and Ultrasound<br />.<br />As a woman, it is important to realize that you are at risk of breast cancer, regardless of your family history. Current statistics show that one-in-eight women will be diagnosed with breast cancer in her lifetime, and this is rapidly headed for one-in-seven women. Numerous steps to prevent breast cancer are known and available, but not mainstream knowledge, so prevention is not being implemented. And, since prevention has not been embraced by American women, early detection of breast cancer is imperative.<br /><br />The American Cancer Society, a long-time staunch defender and promoter of breast cancer screening using mammography, now says it is disappointed that the benefits of using mammography to screen for breast cancer have been overstated. The ACS's November 2009 announcement was followed up with a US task force report disclosing that the X-rays from mammography were a serious health hazard for women.<br /><br />So, what is today's health-conscious woman supposed to do for regular screenings? What other options are available and which technology provides the earliest detection? It is in your best interests to understand all the facts and present your knowledge and concerns to your doctor. Know the facts – they could save your life, the life of your mother, sister, or your best friend.<br /><br />The safest, painless, non-invasive and without harmful radiation tests to screen breast are Medical Diagnostic Thermography and Ultrasound.<br /><br />Breast thermography is safe and noninvasive breast cancer screening technique that can detect signs of cancer up to ten years earlier than is possible using mammography. Breast thermography is approved by the FDA for breast cancer risk assessment. The exam takes only a few minutes, and there is no touching or compression of the breast whatsoever.<br /><br />Breast thermography uses special infrared-sensitive cameras to digitally record images of the variations in surface temperature of the human breast. The recorded images are called thermograms.<br /><br />Blood vessels, cysts, other benign sources, and metabolic processes such as growing breast tumors all radiate heat from within the breast. A portion of the radiated heat reaches the surface of the breast, where it composes a stable thermal pattern.<br /><br />A breast thermography examination consists of recording these thermal patterns and interpreting them according to a strict and complicated analytical procedure. When analyzed properly by highly trained individuals, the images implicitly disclose various pathological and abnormal processes.<br /><br />Breast thermography is based on two solid principals. First, departure from the normal thermal symmetry of the two breasts indicates abnormality and the possible presence of serious pathology. Second, and especially important in the earliest detection of breast disorders, pre-cancerous growths and cancerous tumors are characterized by thermographically visible changes in the breast's vascular system.<br /><br />Thermal Symmetry: Human beings are symmetrical. We have a left side and a right side that in the perfect body, are mirror images of each other. The thermal patterns of two normal, healthy breasts are equally symmetrical uniform temperature distributions interrupted only by the thermal signature of a minimal venous pattern.<br /><br />The normal functioning of the breast is altered with the presence of a breast disorder, and when the functional behavior of a breast changes, thermal symmetry is lost. The more serious the disorder, the more pronounced are the differences in thermal symmetry of the two breasts. Thermography is the only method available with which we can observe the asymmetry.<br /><br />Vascular Changes: Developing cancers are characterized by abnormally elevated temperatures (hyperthermia) and hypervascularity. The developing tumor demands blood for both nourishment and cooling, and the body responds by increasing blood circulation to the region of the tumor.<br /><br />Dormant blood vessels are "awakened," blood vessels expand (vasodilation), existing veins migrate to the tumor site, and new blood vessels are created (angiogenesis).<br /><br />The faster the tumor metabolizes, the more additional blood flow is needed to support and cool it, and the more the body responds by amplifying the vascular capability of the breast. All of these changes are clearly visible and recordable with Thermography. Again, Thermography is the only method available to observe these changes.<br />Detection of breast cancer at very early stage is necessary to get proper treatments. It has been observed that ultrasound has better records than that of mammography for detecting breast cancer.<br /><br />The best combination of tests for breast screening is Diagnostic Thermography and Ultrasound.<br /><br />Breast Ultrasound is an anatomical non-invasive, painless screening test without ionized radiation. Ultrasound uses sound waves to outline a part of the body. For this test, a small instrument called a transducer is placed on the skin (which is often first lubricated with ultrasound gel) and emits sound waves off body tissues. The echoes are converted by a computer into an image that is displayed on a computer screen. Ultrasound imaging is "real-time," meaning that it can show exactly what's happening in the breast at that moment, help to distinguish between cysts (fluid-filled sacs) and solid masses, detect increased vascularity around or within the mass, see the shape, exact size and location of the mass, cyst, calcification or dilated mammary ducts.<br /><br />Breast ultrasound is frequently used to evaluate breast abnormalities. Ultrasound allows significant freedom in obtaining images of the breast from almost any orientation. Ultrasound is excellent at imaging cysts: round, fluid-filled, pockets inside the breast. Additionally, ultrasound can often quickly determine if a suspicious area is in fact a cyst or an increased density of solid tissue (dense mass) which may require additional evaluation to determine if it is malignant (cancerous).<br /><br />If breast ultrasound is a better test for detection of abnormalities, WHY do doctors still ask patients to get a yearly mammogram instead of an ultrasound?<br /><br />Is mammography an effective tool for detecting tumors? In a Swedish study of 60,000 women, 70 percent of the mammographically detected tumors weren't tumors at all. These "false positives" aren't just financial and emotional strains, they may also lead to many unnecessary and invasive biopsies. In fact, 70 to 80 percent of all positive mammograms do not, upon biopsy, show any presence of cancer.<br /><br />At the same time, mammograms also have a high rate of missed tumors, or "false negatives. The National Cancer Institute (NCI) puts the false negative rate even higher at 40 percent among women ages 40-49. National Institutes of Health spokespeople also admit that mammograms miss 10 percent of malignant tumors in women over 50.<br /><br />Researchers have found that breast tissue is denser among younger women, making it difficult to detect tumors. For this reason, false negatives are twice as likely to occur in premenopausal mammograms.<br /><br />Many critics of mammography cite the hazardous health effects of radiation. A mammogram is an X-ray picture of the breast that can reveal tumor growths otherwise undetectable in a physical exam. Like all x-rays, mammograms use doses of ionizing radiation to create the image.<br /><br />Despite better technology and decreased doses of radiation, scientists still claim mammography is a substantial risk. About 75 percent of breast cancer could be prevented by avoiding or minimizing exposure to the ionizing radiation. This includes mammography, x-rays and other medical and dental sources.<br /><br />Since mammographic screening was introduced, the incidence of a form of breast cancer called ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) has increased by 328 percent.<br /><br />Two hundred percent of this increase is allegedly due to mammography. In addition to harmful radiation, mammography may also help spread existing cancer cells due to the considerable pressure placed on the woman's breast during the procedure. According to some health practitioners, this compression could cause existing cancer cells to metastasize from the breast tissue.<br /><br />Cancer research has also found a gene, called oncogene AC that is extremely sensitive to even small doses of radiation. A significant percentage of women in the United States have this gene, which could increase their risk of mammography-induced cancer. They estimate that 10,000 A-T carriers will die of breast cancer this year due to mammography.<br /><br />An analysis conducted by the Seattle Cancer Care Alliance (SCCA) reveals that, overall, ultrasounds have a 95.7 percent sensitivity rate in detecting malignant tumor cells while mammograms are only 60.9 percent sensitive, by comparison. Among 1,208 cases evaluated, ultrasounds also successfully detected about 57 percent more harmful breast cancers compared to mammograms.<br /><br />Earlier study finds ultrasounds far more effective than mammograms.<br /><br />A New Zealand study published in the American Journal of Surgery back in 2004 clearly illustrates this point, having found that ultrasound is "significantly better than mammography for detecting invasive breast cancer," having demonstrated a 92 percent success rate.<br /><br />Combining both mammography and ultrasound, on the other hand, only increased breast cancer detection by nine percent, which may represent statistical insignificance.<br /><br />Early Detection Saves Lives!<br /><br /><a href="http://l.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.universalmedicalimaging.com%2F&h=AAQEes4iZ&enc=AZMOAqrj3WP_ffZJgZM2c6U_LU7TykJNHY5u_etauuUw65Ih-MqjfNKuzohNMMZKtB5p9OyfwKjlftfPxaDL7J66BnX9rncP2YHFrlWy38DQOAbpKKSP-Ca31H41ZT5fikqhb50HC0cDXv-OblzgZtAc&s=1" rel="nofollow nofollow" style="color: #3b5998; cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">www.universalmedicalimaging.com</a><br /><a href="http://l.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.HolisticCode.com%2F&h=GAQEwaZlz&enc=AZPhX5TJ8AFwG1g5y1QeL8lkEckcUGMC6bgHEHkUv3fHyEpdN-b6_-ndCYTJzIoCcBo0gMzTiHJHq6s5wspXxSvZ-D_Zbam7w6mBwZfEoL6NapOWK9nEx3u6jXlDWQIKuO8BAfRxc-TpN-1mjrI_WRKJ&s=1" rel="nofollow nofollow" style="color: #3b5998; cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">www.HolisticCode.com</a><br /><a href="http://l.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.phmiracleliving.com%2Ft-MedicalImaging.aspx&h=HAQERYbw2&enc=AZOkTYYbPp_MAX0WX_pZLSmVNIfApPQIuKwzTD7N8LhOAx4v06yW-IXWf10Tqo7Le9AN3KmB97dJq_Z0O_ZwIvwHWb6xEwCqvG2YtHC-U1PVibns-TvIX8xDwbo3NlhRP64ec16tHEvUScx7uhgW-Y94&s=1" rel="nofollow nofollow" style="color: #3b5998; cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">http://www.phmiracleliving.com/t-MedicalImaging.aspx</a></span></div></span></div></div></div><a ajaxify="https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1440392406227675&set=a.1382115465388703.1073741828.100007707879435&type=1&relevant_count=1&src=https%3A%2F%2Fscontent-b.xx.fbcdn.net%2Fhphotos-xpa1%2Ft1.0-9%2F10520633_1440392406227675_4791726454375988801_n.jpg&size=960%2C597&source=9&player_origin=timeline" class="photo photoWidth1 _4dsy" data-ft="{"tn":"E"}" data-gt="{"fbid":"1440392406227675"}" href="https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1440392406227675&set=a.1382115465388703.1073741828.100007707879435&type=1&relevant_count=1" rel="theater" style="color: #3b5998; cursor: pointer; display: block; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: -9px; margin-right: -9px; margin-top: 0px; text-decoration: underline;"><div class="letterboxedImage photoWrap" style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: #f2f2f2; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial; height: 312px; position: relative; width: 504px;"><div class="uiScaledImageContainer scaledImage" style="height: 312px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; margin-top: 0px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden; position: relative; width: 501px;"><img alt="Photo: Eating Red Meat Increases Risk For Breast Cancer! . . . Eating red meat is linked to breast cancer, according to a new study in the British Medical Journal. Premenopausal women participating in Harvard’s Nurses’ Health Study II who consumed the most red meat were 22 percent more likely to develop breast cancer, compared with those who consumed the least. Each additional serving of red meat per day was associated with a 13 percent increased risk in breast cancer. . . . Farvid MS, Cho E, Chen WY, Eliassen AH, Willett WC. Dietary protein sources in early adulthood and breast cancer incidence: prospective cohort study. BMJ. Published online June 10, 2014 https://www.facebook.com/130716166943671/photos/a.650980698250546.1073741831.130716166943671/721888044493144/?type=3&theater Breast Cancer Detection Using Thermography and Ultrasound . As a woman, it is important to realize that you are at risk of breast cancer, regardless of your family history. Current statistics show that one-in-eight women will be diagnosed with breast cancer in her lifetime, and this is rapidly headed for one-in-seven women. Numerous steps to prevent breast cancer are known and available, but not mainstream knowledge, so prevention is not being implemented. And, since prevention has not been embraced by American women, early detection of breast cancer is imperative. The American Cancer Society, a long-time staunch defender and promoter of breast cancer screening using mammography, now says it is disappointed that the benefits of using mammography to screen for breast cancer have been overstated. The ACS's November 2009 announcement was followed up with a US task force report disclosing that the X-rays from mammography were a serious health hazard for women. So, what is today's health-conscious woman supposed to do for regular screenings? What other options are available and which technology provides the earliest detection? It is in your best interests to understand all the facts and present your knowledge and concerns to your doctor. Know the facts – they could save your life, the life of your mother, sister, or your best friend. The safest, painless, non-invasive and without harmful radiation tests to screen breast are Medical Diagnostic Thermography and Ultrasound. Breast thermography is safe and noninvasive breast cancer screening technique that can detect signs of cancer up to ten years earlier than is possible using mammography. Breast thermography is approved by the FDA for breast cancer risk assessment. The exam takes only a few minutes, and there is no touching or compression of the breast whatsoever. Breast thermography uses special infrared-sensitive cameras to digitally record images of the variations in surface temperature of the human breast. The recorded images are called thermograms. Blood vessels, cysts, other benign sources, and metabolic processes such as growing breast tumors all radiate heat from within the breast. A portion of the radiated heat reaches the surface of the breast, where it composes a stable thermal pattern. A breast thermography examination consists of recording these thermal patterns and interpreting them according to a strict and complicated analytical procedure. When analyzed properly by highly trained individuals, the images implicitly disclose various pathological and abnormal processes. Breast thermography is based on two solid principals. First, departure from the normal thermal symmetry of the two breasts indicates abnormality and the possible presence of serious pathology. Second, and especially important in the earliest detection of breast disorders, pre-cancerous growths and cancerous tumors are characterized by thermographically visible changes in the breast's vascular system. Thermal Symmetry: Human beings are symmetrical. We have a left side and a right side that in the perfect body, are mirror images of each other. The thermal patterns of two normal, healthy breasts are equally symmetrical uniform temperature distributions interrupted only by the thermal signature of a minimal venous pattern. The normal functioning of the breast is altered with the presence of a breast disorder, and when the functional behavior of a breast changes, thermal symmetry is lost. The more serious the disorder, the more pronounced are the differences in thermal symmetry of the two breasts. Thermography is the only method available with which we can observe the asymmetry. Vascular Changes: Developing cancers are characterized by abnormally elevated temperatures (hyperthermia) and hypervascularity. The developing tumor demands blood for both nourishment and cooling, and the body responds by increasing blood circulation to the region of the tumor. Dormant blood vessels are "awakened," blood vessels expand (vasodilation), existing veins migrate to the tumor site, and new blood vessels are created (angiogenesis). The faster the tumor metabolizes, the more additional blood flow is needed to support and cool it, and the more the body responds by amplifying the vascular capability of the breast. All of these changes are clearly visible and recordable with Thermography. Again, Thermography is the only method available to observe these changes. Detection of breast cancer at very early stage is necessary to get proper treatments. It has been observed that ultrasound has better records than that of mammography for detecting breast cancer. The best combination of tests for breast screening is Diagnostic Thermography and Ultrasound. Breast Ultrasound is an anatomical non-invasive, painless screening test without ionized radiation. Ultrasound uses sound waves to outline a part of the body. For this test, a small instrument called a transducer is placed on the skin (which is often first lubricated with ultrasound gel) and emits sound waves off body tissues. The echoes are converted by a computer into an image that is displayed on a computer screen. Ultrasound imaging is "real-time," meaning that it can show exactly what's happening in the breast at that moment, help to distinguish between cysts (fluid-filled sacs) and solid masses, detect increased vascularity around or within the mass, see the shape, exact size and location of the mass, cyst, calcification or dilated mammary ducts. Breast ultrasound is frequently used to evaluate breast abnormalities. Ultrasound allows significant freedom in obtaining images of the breast from almost any orientation. Ultrasound is excellent at imaging cysts: round, fluid-filled, pockets inside the breast. Additionally, ultrasound can often quickly determine if a suspicious area is in fact a cyst or an increased density of solid tissue (dense mass) which may require additional evaluation to determine if it is malignant (cancerous). If breast ultrasound is a better test for detection of abnormalities, WHY do doctors still ask patients to get a yearly mammogram instead of an ultrasound? Is mammography an effective tool for detecting tumors? In a Swedish study of 60,000 women, 70 percent of the mammographically detected tumors weren't tumors at all. These "false positives" aren't just financial and emotional strains, they may also lead to many unnecessary and invasive biopsies. In fact, 70 to 80 percent of all positive mammograms do not, upon biopsy, show any presence of cancer. At the same time, mammograms also have a high rate of missed tumors, or "false negatives. The National Cancer Institute (NCI) puts the false negative rate even higher at 40 percent among women ages 40-49. National Institutes of Health spokespeople also admit that mammograms miss 10 percent of malignant tumors in women over 50. Researchers have found that breast tissue is denser among younger women, making it difficult to detect tumors. For this reason, false negatives are twice as likely to occur in premenopausal mammograms. Many critics of mammography cite the hazardous health effects of radiation. A mammogram is an X-ray picture of the breast that can reveal tumor growths otherwise undetectable in a physical exam. Like all x-rays, mammograms use doses of ionizing radiation to create the image. Despite better technology and decreased doses of radiation, scientists still claim mammography is a substantial risk. About 75 percent of breast cancer could be prevented by avoiding or minimizing exposure to the ionizing radiation. This includes mammography, x-rays and other medical and dental sources. Since mammographic screening was introduced, the incidence of a form of breast cancer called ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) has increased by 328 percent. Two hundred percent of this increase is allegedly due to mammography. In addition to harmful radiation, mammography may also help spread existing cancer cells due to the considerable pressure placed on the woman's breast during the procedure. According to some health practitioners, this compression could cause existing cancer cells to metastasize from the breast tissue. Cancer research has also found a gene, called oncogene AC that is extremely sensitive to even small doses of radiation. A significant percentage of women in the United States have this gene, which could increase their risk of mammography-induced cancer. They estimate that 10,000 A-T carriers will die of breast cancer this year due to mammography. An analysis conducted by the Seattle Cancer Care Alliance (SCCA) reveals that, overall, ultrasounds have a 95.7 percent sensitivity rate in detecting malignant tumor cells while mammograms are only 60.9 percent sensitive, by comparison. Among 1,208 cases evaluated, ultrasounds also successfully detected about 57 percent more harmful breast cancers compared to mammograms. Earlier study finds ultrasounds far more effective than mammograms. A New Zealand study published in the American Journal of Surgery back in 2004 clearly illustrates this point, having found that ultrasound is "significantly better than mammography for detecting invasive breast cancer," having demonstrated a 92 percent success rate. Combining both mammography and ultrasound, on the other hand, only increased breast cancer detection by nine percent, which may represent statistical insignificance. Early Detection Saves Lives! www.universalmedicalimaging.com www.HolisticCode.com http://www.phmiracleliving.com/t-MedicalImaging.aspx" class="img" height="312" src="https://scontent-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpa1/t1.0-9/s851x315/10520633_1440392406227675_4791726454375988801_n.jpg" style="border-bottom-width: 0px; border-color: initial; border-left-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-top-width: 0px; height: 312px; left: 0px; min-height: 100%; position: relative;" width="502" /></div></div></a></div>

Eating Meat Causes Cancer!

Eating Red Meat Increases Risk For Breast Cancer!. . .Eating red meat is linked to breast cancer, according to a new study in the British Medical Journal. Premenopausal women participating in Harvard’s Nurses’ Health Study II who consumed the most red meat were 22 percent more likely to develop brea…

Read more »

Stem Cells Produced in the Crypts of the Small Intestines

<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: #999999; font-family: Helvetica, Arial, 'lucida grande', tahoma, verdana, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 15px;"></span><br /><div role="article"><div class="aboveUnitContent" style="margin-bottom: 15px; margin-top: 15px;"><div class="userContentWrapper"><div class="_wk" style="font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px;"><span class="userContent"><div class="text_exposed_root text_exposed" id="id_53bcd9850aba16770542665" style="display: inline;">Dr. Robert O. Young's Diabetes Research Validated! Insulin Producing Beta Cells Produced in the Crypts of the Small Intestines!<br /><br /><a href="http://articlesofhealth.blogspot.com/2014/07/dr-robert-o-youngs-diabetes-research.html" rel="nofollow nofollow" style="color: #3b5998; cursor: pointer; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">http://articlesofhealth.blogspot.com/2014/07/dr-robert-o-youngs-diabetes-research.html</a><br /><br />The following article v<span class="text_exposed_show" style="display: inline;">alidates Dr. Robert O. Young's research that Type I diabetes can be reversed with the healthy production of stem cells in the crypts of the small intestines. According to Dr. Young's research, Type 1 diabetes is a dis-ease of the small intestines with the congeston, constipation and/or damage to the intestinal villi where stem cells are produced. These stem cells are the primary embryonic cells that are biologically transformed into blood cells and then into body cells such as insulin producing pancreatic B-cells. When the gut is healthy the blood is healthy and when the blood is healthy the body is healthy, including the organs, glands and connective tissues.<br /><br />Embryonic Gut Cells May Be Coaxed to Make Insulin for People With Type 1 Diabetes - Insulin is an alkaline buffer which chelates to metabolic and dietary acids such as glucose, sucrose, fructose, maltose, uric acid and lactic acid, just to name a few.<br /><br />Early study in mouse and human cells shows promise, but more research is needed<br /><br />By Mary Elizabeth Dallas<br />Monday, June 30, 2014<br /><br />The team from Columbia University Medical Center in New York City said their findings hold promise for the development of a new treatment for type 1 diabetes that does not involve stem cells.<br /><br />MONDAY, June 30, 2014 (HealthDay News) -- Scientists are hopeful that cells inside the human gut might someday be retrained to produce insulin, the metabolic hormone that's lacking in people with type 1 diabetes.<br /><br />For people with type 1 diabetes, their body's natural insulin-producing cells, known as pancreatic beta cells, are destroyed by their immune system. For the past 20 years, scientists have been trying to help the body make new insulin-producing cells that replace those that are lost to the disease.<br /><br />"The search for the 'holy grail' is to produce a source of insulin producing cells either for transplantation or to convert the body's own cells to make sufficient insulin," said one expert, Dr. Derek LeRoith, professor of medicine and diabetes at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, in New York City.<br /><br />Right now, "insulin injections must be used to replace this lack in insulin production and release," said LeRoith, who was not involved in the new research.<br /><br />Insulin-producing cells have been created before using stem cells, but these cells do not yet fully function like natural insulin-producing cells, the Columbia research team explained.<br /><br />However, by simply turning off a particular gene, the Columbia scientists were able to convert cells in the human gut into cells that make insulin. They said the findings suggest that "reeducating" existing cells may be an easier way to replace the cells lost in type 1 diabetes than creating new cells using stem cell technology.<br /><br />"People have been talking about turning one cell into another for a long time, but until now we hadn't gotten to the point of creating a fully functional insulin-producing cell by the manipulation of a single target," study senior researcher Dr. Domenico Accili, a professor of medicine at Columbia, said in a university news release.<br /><br />Prior research conducted by the team at Columbia involving mice revealed that intestinal cells could be turned into insulin-producing cells. Insulin made by the transformed gut cells was then released into the bloodstream and effectively controlled the blood sugar levels in diabetic mice. The research was subsequently confirmed by another team of scientists.<br /><br />The Columbia team's latest findings found this technique also hold promise for the treatment of type 1 diabetes in human cells.<br />In conducting the study, published online June 30 in Nature Communications, the researchers re-created a tissue model of the human intestine using stem cells. They then retrained the gut cells to make insulin by turning off a particular gene, known as the FOXO1 gene.<br /><br />According to Accili's team, the genetically engineered cells began emitting insulin in about a week. The study's authors also pointed out that the cells only released the insulin in response to sugar.<br /><br />"By showing that human cells can respond in the same way as mouse cells, we have cleared a main hurdle and can now move forward to try to make this treatment a reality," Accili said.<br />For his part LeRoith called the study "exciting."<br /><br />"This study and others like it may form the basis of future development of insulin producing cells that could be used in 'curing' type 1 diabetes," he said.<br /><br />The research is very early, and laboratory studies don't always translate into success in humans. However, the researchers remain hopeful. Accili said that the next step in developing a new type 1 diabetes treatment involves to find a drug that can block the FOXO1 gene in the human gut.<br /><br />SOURCE: Derek LeRoith, M.D., professor of medicine, endocrinology, diabetes and bone disease, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City; Columbia University Medical Center, news release, June 30, 2014</span></div></span></div></div></div><a ajaxify="https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1440415482892034&set=a.1382115465388703.1073741828.100007707879435&type=1&relevant_count=1&src=https%3A%2F%2Fscontent-a.xx.fbcdn.net%2Fhphotos-xpa1%2Ft1.0-9%2F10527380_1440415482892034_3996152859723578718_n.jpg&size=720%2C540&source=9&player_origin=timeline" class="photo photoWidth1 _4dsy" data-ft="{"tn":"E"}" data-gt="{"fbid":"1440415482892034"}" href="https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1440415482892034&set=a.1382115465388703.1073741828.100007707879435&type=1&relevant_count=1" rel="theater" style="color: #3b5998; cursor: pointer; display: block; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: -9px; margin-right: -9px; margin-top: 0px; text-decoration: none;"><div class="letterboxedImage photoWrap verticallyCentered" style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: #f2f2f2; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial; height: 378px; position: relative; width: 504px;"><div class="uiScaledImageContainer scaledImage" style="height: 377px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; margin-top: -188px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden; position: absolute; top: 50%; width: 504px;"><img alt="Photo: Dr. Robert O. Young's Diabetes Research Validated! Insulin Producing Beta Cells Produced in the Crypts of the Small Intestines! http://articlesofhealth.blogspot.com/2014/07/dr-robert-o-youngs-diabetes-research.html The following article validates Dr. Robert O. Young's research that Type I diabetes can be reversed with the healthy production of stem cells in the crypts of the small intestines. According to Dr. Young's research, Type 1 diabetes is a dis-ease of the small intestines with the congeston, constipation and/or damage to the intestinal villi where stem cells are produced. These stem cells are the primary embryonic cells that are biologically transformed into blood cells and then into body cells such as insulin producing pancreatic B-cells. When the gut is healthy the blood is healthy and when the blood is healthy the body is healthy, including the organs, glands and connective tissues. Embryonic Gut Cells May Be Coaxed to Make Insulin for People With Type 1 Diabetes - Insulin is an alkaline buffer which chelates to metabolic and dietary acids such as glucose, sucrose, fructose, maltose, uric acid and lactic acid, just to name a few. Early study in mouse and human cells shows promise, but more research is needed By Mary Elizabeth Dallas Monday, June 30, 2014 The team from Columbia University Medical Center in New York City said their findings hold promise for the development of a new treatment for type 1 diabetes that does not involve stem cells. MONDAY, June 30, 2014 (HealthDay News) -- Scientists are hopeful that cells inside the human gut might someday be retrained to produce insulin, the metabolic hormone that's lacking in people with type 1 diabetes. For people with type 1 diabetes, their body's natural insulin-producing cells, known as pancreatic beta cells, are destroyed by their immune system. For the past 20 years, scientists have been trying to help the body make new insulin-producing cells that replace those that are lost to the disease. "The search for the 'holy grail' is to produce a source of insulin producing cells either for transplantation or to convert the body's own cells to make sufficient insulin," said one expert, Dr. Derek LeRoith, professor of medicine and diabetes at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, in New York City. Right now, "insulin injections must be used to replace this lack in insulin production and release," said LeRoith, who was not involved in the new research. Insulin-producing cells have been created before using stem cells, but these cells do not yet fully function like natural insulin-producing cells, the Columbia research team explained. However, by simply turning off a particular gene, the Columbia scientists were able to convert cells in the human gut into cells that make insulin. They said the findings suggest that "reeducating" existing cells may be an easier way to replace the cells lost in type 1 diabetes than creating new cells using stem cell technology. "People have been talking about turning one cell into another for a long time, but until now we hadn't gotten to the point of creating a fully functional insulin-producing cell by the manipulation of a single target," study senior researcher Dr. Domenico Accili, a professor of medicine at Columbia, said in a university news release. Prior research conducted by the team at Columbia involving mice revealed that intestinal cells could be turned into insulin-producing cells. Insulin made by the transformed gut cells was then released into the bloodstream and effectively controlled the blood sugar levels in diabetic mice. The research was subsequently confirmed by another team of scientists. The Columbia team's latest findings found this technique also hold promise for the treatment of type 1 diabetes in human cells. In conducting the study, published online June 30 in Nature Communications, the researchers re-created a tissue model of the human intestine using stem cells. They then retrained the gut cells to make insulin by turning off a particular gene, known as the FOXO1 gene. According to Accili's team, the genetically engineered cells began emitting insulin in about a week. The study's authors also pointed out that the cells only released the insulin in response to sugar. "By showing that human cells can respond in the same way as mouse cells, we have cleared a main hurdle and can now move forward to try to make this treatment a reality," Accili said. For his part LeRoith called the study "exciting." "This study and others like it may form the basis of future development of insulin producing cells that could be used in 'curing' type 1 diabetes," he said. The research is very early, and laboratory studies don't always translate into success in humans. However, the researchers remain hopeful. Accili said that the next step in developing a new type 1 diabetes treatment involves to find a drug that can block the FOXO1 gene in the human gut. SOURCE: Derek LeRoith, M.D., professor of medicine, endocrinology, diabetes and bone disease, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City; Columbia University Medical Center, news release, June 30, 2014" class="scaledImageFitWidth img" height="378" src="https://scontent-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpa1/t1.0-9/p526x296/10527380_1440415482892034_3996152859723578718_n.jpg" style="border-bottom-width: 0px; border-color: initial; border-left-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-top-width: 0px; height: auto; min-height: 100%; position: relative; top: 0px; width: 504px;" width="504" /></div></div></a></div><div class="fbTimelineUFI uiCommentContainer" style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: white; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial; color: #4e5665; margin-bottom: -12px; margin-left: -12px; padding-top: 3px; position: relative; width: 510px;"><form action="https://www.facebook.com/ajax/ufi/modify.php" class="live_1440415482892034_316526391751760 commentable_item hidden_add_comment collapsed_comments" data-ft="{"tn":"]"}" data-live="{"seq":0}" id="u_jsonp_19_1f" method="post" rel="async" style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px;"><div class="fbTimelineFeedbackHeader"><div class="clearfix fbTimelineFeedbackActions" style="background-attachment: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: #fafbfb; background-image: initial; background-origin: initial; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial; border-top-color: rgb(233, 234, 237); border-top-style: solid; border-top-width: 1px; padding-bottom: 9px; padding-left: 12px; padding-right: 12px; padding-top: 8px; zoom: 1;"><div class="clearfix" style="zoom: 1;"><div class="_4bl7 _4bl8" style="float: right; min-height: 1px; word-wrap: break-word;"></div><div class="_4bl9" style="overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden; word-wrap: break-word;"><span class="UFIBlingBoxTimeline" style="float: right;"><span data-reactid=".jj"></span></span><span class="UIActionLinks UIActionLinks_bottom" data-ft="{"tn":"=","type":20}" style="color: #999999;"><span><span data-reactid=".jk"><a aria-live="polite" class="UFILikeLink accessible_elem" data-reactid=".jk.0" href="https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100007707879435#" role="button" style="clip: rect(1px 1px 1px 1px); color: #3b5998; cursor: pointer; font-family: Helvetica, Arial, 'lucida grande', tahoma, verdana, arial, sans-serif; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden; position: absolute; text-decoration: none; width: 1px;" title="Like this">Like</a><div><br /></div><a aria-live="polite" class="UFILikeLink" data-ft="{"tn":">"}" data-reactid=".jk.1" href="https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100007707879435#" role="button" style="color: #3b5998; cursor: pointer; font-family: Helvetica, Arial, 'lucida grande', tahoma, verdana, arial, sans-serif; text-decoration: none;" title="Like this"></a></span></span><a aria-live="polite" class="UFILikeLink" data-ft="{"tn":">"}" data-reactid=".jk.1" href="https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100007707879435#" role="button" style="color: #3b5998; cursor: pointer; font-family: Helvetica, Arial, 'lucida grande', tahoma, verdana, arial, sans-serif; text-decoration: none;" title="Like this"></a></span></div></div></div></div></form></div></div>

Stem Cells Produced in the Crypts of the Small Intestines

Dr. Robert O. Young's Diabetes Research Validated! Insulin Producing Beta Cells Produced in the Crypts of the Small Intestines!http://articlesofhealth.blogspot.com/2014/07/dr-robert-o-youngs-diabetes-research.htmlThe following article validates Dr. Robert O. Young's research that Type I diabetes can…

Read more »

Tom Campbell | What Defines a Real Scientist?

Source: <a href="http://my-big-toe.com/" target="_blank">my-big-TOE.com</a><br /><br /> <iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="309" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/A2vCohtqSt0" width="550"></iframe><br /><br />"The breakthroughs come from the fringe."<br />Thomas Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolution.<br /><br />Tom Campbell describes what real scientists look for and credits the many scientists out there who practice real science by questioning, pursuing and experimenting with the anomalies they discover.  <br /><br />"If you are a real scientist, you must follow the truth", Tom Campbell.<br /><br />In this interview, Tom discusses the work of physicists, astrophysicists, engineers, psychologists, psychiatrists, cellular biologists, mathematicians, computer science experts, medical doctors, and more and explains that My Big TOE builds a foundation for all their work. This is what defines the "big" in a theory of everything. It is inclusive of all.<br /><br />Towards the end of the interview, Tom delivers a quick summary of the logical process that built My Big TOE. "The value of it is that it pulls things together."<br /><br />Tom also explains that the logic used in MBT is workable and proven in mathematical calculations and computer processes.<br /><br />In addition,Tom shows that past life experience packets are a logical requirement of the MBT system, an acknowledgement to the groundbreaking work of Dr Brian Weiss.<br /><br />With much emphasis on the objective world in science, and virtually none to the subjective, which world is most significant in our lives?<br /><br />Not afraid to "go boldly where no man has gone before", this interview is dedicated to all the true scientists out there today. To be a true scientist takes courage.<br /><br />Here are just a few scientists mentioned in the interview: Russell Targ, Hal Putoff, Brian Whitworth,  John Ringland,  Brian Weiss,  Jim Tucker,  Michael Newton,  Rupert Sheldrake,  Bernard Haisch,  John Conway,  J B Rhine,  PEAR Labs,  Bruce Lipton,  Helen Wambach,  Dean Radin

Tom Campbell | What Defines a Real Scientist?

Source: my-big-TOE.com "The breakthroughs come from the fringe."Thomas Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolution.Tom Campbell describes what real scientists look for and credits the many scientists out there who practice real science by questioning, pursuing and experimenting with the anomalies …

Read more »

Dr. Robert O. Young's Diabetes Research Validated! Insulin Producing Beta Cells Produced in the Crypts of the Small Intestines!

<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: #333333; line-height: 19px;"></span><br /><h1 class="pheader title" style="color: #0082c8; font-family: 'Lucida Grande', Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 1.6em; font-weight: bold; font: normal normal normal 1em/1.2 'Lucida Grande', Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; margin-bottom: 0.5em; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px; padding-left: 0px;">The following article validates Dr. Robert O. Young's research that Type I diabetes can be reversed with the healthy production of stem cells in the crypts of the small intestines.  According to Dr. Young's research, Type 1 diabetes is a dis-ease of the small intestines with the congeston, constipation and/or damage to the intestinal villi where stem cells are produced.  These stem cells are the primary embryonic cells that are biologically transformed into blood cells and then into body cells such as insulin producing pancreatic B-cells.  When the gut is healthy the blood is healthy and when the blood is healthy the body is healthy, including the organs, glands and connective tissues.</h1><h1 class="pheader title" style="color: #0082c8; font-family: 'Lucida Grande', Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 1.6em; font-weight: bold; font: normal normal normal 1em/1.2 'Lucida Grande', Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; margin-bottom: 0.5em; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px; padding-left: 0px;">Embryonic Gut Cells May Be Coaxed to Make Insulin for People With Type 1 Diabetes - Insulin is an alkaline buffer which chelates to metabolic and dietary acids such as glucose, sucrose, fructose, maltose, uric acid and lactic acid, just to name a few.</h1><div class="subheading" style="color: #0082c8; font-weight: bold; margin-bottom: 20px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 20px; text-decoration: none;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;">Early study in mouse and human cells shows promise, but more research is needed</span></div><div style="margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"></div><div id="author"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;">By Mary Elizabeth Dallas</span></div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;">Monday, June 30, 2014</span><div id="newsmain" style="padding-top: 15px;"><img alt="HealthDay news image" border="0" src="http://media.healthday.com/images/editorial/coloncancer.jpg" style="border-bottom-style: none; border-color: initial; border-left-style: none; border-right-style: none; border-top-style: none; border-width: initial; float: left; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 10px; margin-top: 2px;" title="HealthDay news image" /></div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: #333333; line-height: 19px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;"><br />The team from Columbia University Medical Center in New York City said their findings hold promise for the development of a new treatment for type 1 diabetes that does not involve stem cells.</span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: #333333; line-height: 19px;"><div style="padding-top: 15px;"><div style="margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;">MONDAY, June 30, 2014 (HealthDay News) -- Scientists are hopeful that cells inside the human gut might someday be retrained to produce insulin, the metabolic hormone that's lacking in people with type 1 diabetes.</span></div><div style="margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;">For people with type 1 diabetes, their body's natural insulin-producing cells, known as pancreatic beta cells, are destroyed by their immune system. For the past 20 years, scientists have been trying to help the body make new insulin-producing cells that replace those that are lost to the disease.</span></div><div style="margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;">"The search for the 'holy grail' is to produce a source of insulin producing cells either for transplantation or to convert the body's own cells to make sufficient insulin," said one expert, Dr. Derek LeRoith, professor of medicine and diabetes at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, in New York City.</span></div><div style="margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;">Right now, "insulin injections must be used to replace this lack in insulin production and release," said LeRoith, who was not involved in the new research.</span></div><div style="margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;">Insulin-producing cells have been created before using stem cells, but these cells do not yet fully function like natural insulin-producing cells, the Columbia research team explained.</span></div><div style="margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;">However, by simply turning off a particular gene, the Columbia scientists were able to convert cells in the human gut into cells that make insulin. They said the findings suggest that "reeducating" existing cells may be an easier way to replace the cells lost in type 1 diabetes than creating new cells using stem cell technology.</span></div><div style="margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;">"People have been talking about turning one cell into another for a long time, but until now we hadn't gotten to the point of creating a fully functional insulin-producing cell by the manipulation of a single target," study senior researcher Dr. Domenico Accili, a professor of medicine at Columbia, said in a university news release.</span></div><div style="margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;">Prior research conducted by the team at Columbia involving mice revealed that intestinal cells could be turned into insulin-producing cells. Insulin made by the transformed gut cells was then released into the bloodstream and effectively controlled the blood sugar levels in diabetic mice. The research was subsequently confirmed by another team of scientists.</span></div><div style="margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;">The Columbia team's latest findings found this technique also hold promise for the treatment of type 1 diabetes in human cells.</span></div><div style="margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;">In conducting the study, published online June 30 in <i>Nature Communications</i>, the researchers re-created a tissue model of the human intestine using stem cells. They then retrained the gut cells to make insulin by turning off a particular gene, known as the FOXO1 gene.</span></div><div style="margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;">According to Accili's team, the genetically engineered cells began emitting insulin in about a week. The study's authors also pointed out that the cells only released the insulin in response to sugar.</span></div><div style="margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;">"By showing that human cells can respond in the same way as mouse cells, we have cleared a main hurdle and can now move forward to try to make this treatment a reality," Accili said.</span></div><div style="margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;">For his part LeRoith called the study "exciting."</span></div><div style="margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;">"This study and others like it may form the basis of future development of insulin producing cells that could be used in 'curing' type 1 diabetes," he said.</span></div><div style="margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;">The research is very early, and laboratory studies don't always translate into success in humans. However, the researchers remain hopeful. Accili said that the next step in developing a new type 1 diabetes treatment involves to find a drug that can block the FOXO1 gene in the human gut.</span></div></div><div style="margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: large;">SOURCE: Derek LeRoith, M.D., professor of medicine, endocrinology, diabetes and bone disease, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City; Columbia University Medical Center, news release, June 30, 2014</span></div><div><br /></div></span></div>

Dr. Robert O. Young's Diabetes Research Validated! Insulin Producing Beta Cells Produced in the Crypts of the Small Intestines!

The following article validates Dr. Robert O. Young's research that Type I diabetes can be reversed with the healthy production of stem cells in the crypts of the small intestines.  According to Dr. Young's research, Type 1 diabetes is a dis-ease of the small intestines with the congeston, constipat…

Read more »